Pain management and adverse effects of patient-controlled morphine and pethidine for postoperative cardiac surgery

Dung Nguyễn, Nguyen Huu Tu

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was to compare the analgesic effect and side effects of patient- controlled analgesia device with the different regiment of morphine and pethidine after cardiac surgery. This is a prospective, randomized, and single-blinded study performed at The Cardiovascular center of E Hospital. Fifty patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery were included in the study. After extubation, participants were randomized into 2 groups of 25 patients each. Groups M w was given morphine (bolus dose 1mg, lockout 5 minutes, limit 20mg/4h) and group P was given pethidine (bolus dose 25mg, lockout 5 minutes, limit 150mg/4h). Pain was assessed by using a visual analog scale (0 - 10), and sedation was assessed with the Ramsay sedation score (1-6) in the first 3 days after extubation. VAS at rest of group P was lower than group M, (0.36 ± 0.57) versus (1.16 ± 0.9) p < 0.01 at day 2 postoperatively; VAS score at movement and side effects such as nausea, vomiting and urinary retention were similar between the two groups. However, group P had a lower sedation score than group M at 0.32 (95% CI= -0.51; -0.12, p < 0.01).

Article Details

References

1. Morriss WW, Roques CJ. Pain management in low- and middle-income countries. BJA Education. 2018; 18(9):265-270. doi:10.1016/j.bjae.2018.05.006.
2. PQIP Annual Report 2018-19.
3. Hans J, Sanjay A. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118(4):934-944. doi:10.1097/ALN.0B013E31828866B3
4. Narinder Rawal. Current issues in postoperative pain management. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2016; 33(3):160-171. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366
5. Zubrzycki M, Liebold A, Skrabal C, et al. Assessment and pathophysiology of pain in cardiac surgery. Journal of Pain Research. 2018; 11:1599-1611. doi:10.2147/JPR.S162067.
6. Small C, Laycock H. Acute postoperative pain management. British Journal of Surgery. 2020;107(2):e70-e80. doi:10.1002/BJS.11477.
7. Narinder Rawal. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2012; 37(3):310-317. doi:10.1097/AAP.0B013E31825735C6.
8. Effect of opioid-related adverse events on outcomes in selected surgical patients. Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy. 2013;27(1):62-70. doi:10.3109/15360288.2012.751956.
9. Srivastava D, Wilkinson P. Surgery and opioids: some cracks in an enduring romance. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021;126(6):1088-1092. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.003.
10. Ramsay MAE, Savege TM, Simpson BRJ, Goodwin R. British medical journal Hospital Topics Controlled Sedation with Alphaxalone-Alphadolone. 1974.
11. Cashman J, Dolin Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of acute postoperative pain management: evidence from published data. British journal of anaesthesia. 2004; 93(2): 212-223.
Wu C, Raja S. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2215-2225. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6.
12. Annie Woodhouse, AlickF T Hobbes. A comparison of morphine, pethidine and fentanyl in the postsurgical patient-controlled analgesia environment. Pain. 1996;64(1):115-121. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00082-.
13. Unlugenc H, Vardar MA, Tetiker S. A comparative study of the analgesic effect of patient-controlled morphine, pethidine, and tramadol for postoperative pain management after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2008;106(1):309-312. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000287815.32869.2A
14. Dinges HC, Otto S, Stay DK, et al. Side effect rates of opioids in equianalgesic doses via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2019;129(4):1153-1162. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000003887.
15. Dolin S, Cashman J. Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data. British journal of anaesthesia. 2005;95(5):584-591. doi:10.1093/BJA/AEI227