15. Trapezius myocutaneous flap for head, neck, back defects caused by cancer: application and results
Main Article Content
Abstract
The head, neck, back are common occurrence sites for skin and soft tissue cancer, which usually cause large defects in need of reconstruction. Trapezius myocutaneous flaps have a constant blood supply, are easy to dissect, has large skin paddle, therefore they are ideal materials for head, neck, and back reconstruction. Objective: Describing the result of trapezius myocutaneous flap reconstruction in head, neck, and back cancer. Method: Serial case report with sixteen patients with histopathically diagnosed cancer in the region of the head, neck, and back, whose defects were reconstructed by using trapezius myocutaneous flap in Vietnam National K Hospital. Results: Largest defect of 22x16cm, smallest defect of 12x9cm. 75% of the defects were in or near the scalp area. 25% of the defects were in the upper back area. 87.5% of the flaps have uneventful postoperative courses, 6.25% of the flaps has partial necrosis and 6.25% of the flap has total necrosis. Conclusions: Trapezius myocutaneous flap is highly suitable for reconstruction following head, neck, back cancer excision.
Article Details
Keywords
trapezius myocutaneous flap, head, neck and back, defect from cancer
References
2. Hicks K, Thomas JR. Skin and composite grafts. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2022;9:2. doi: 10.20517/2347-9264.2021.65.
3. Jacobson LK, Johnson MB, Dedhia RD, Niknam-Bienia S, Wong AK. Impaired wound healing after radiation therapy: A systematic review of pathogenesis and treatment. JPRAS Open. 2017;13:92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2017.04.001.
4. Miller H, Bush K, Delancy M, et al. Effect of preoperative radiation on free flap outcomes for head and neck reconstruction: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2022;75(2):743-752. doi: 10.1016/j.bj ps.2021.09.050.
5. Sugrue CM, Rooney G, Sugrue RM. Trapezius flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects following oncological resection - A systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(12):2115-2119. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.20 17.10.001.
6. Ciudad P, Agko M, Manrique OJ, et al. The retrograde transverse cervical artery as a recipient vessel for free tissue transfer in complex head and neck reconstruction with a vessel-depleted neck. Microsurgery. 2017;37(8):902-909. doi: 10.1002/micr.30193.
7. Naalla R, Murthy V, Chauhan S, Chinta K, Singhal M. Revisiting the trapezius fFlap as a reconstructive option for cervico-occipital and thoracic spine regions. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019;52(3):322-323. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400 677.
8. Tan KC, Tan BK. Extended lower trapezius island myocutaneous flap: A fasciomyocutaneous flap based on the dorsal scapular artery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2000;105(5):1758-1763.
9. Xie T, Liu Y, Han T, et al. Flap design and preliminary clinical experience of the lower trapezius musculocutaneous flap carrying a portion of the latissimus dorsi muscle. Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2021;35:349-355. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202009114.
10. Rickenbacher J, Landolt AM, Theiler K, et al. Outline of the arteries of the back. In: Rickenbacher J, Landolt AM, Theiler K, Scheier H, Siegfried J, Wagenhäuser FJ, eds. Applied Anatomy of the Back. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1985:101-106. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05791-9_5.
11. Numajiri T, Morita D, Tsujiko S, Moriguchi Y. Extension toward the Trapezius in a transversely oriented latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 2021;9(7):e3695. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003695.
12. Atiyeh BS, Hamdan AM, Nassar SI, Hanbali FS, Hashim HA. Vascularized fascial patch for repair of suboccipital dural defect. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1996;37(4):422-427.
13. Chen WL, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ, Fan S, Zhang DM, Wang YY. Craniofacial resection and reconstruction in patients with recurrent cancer involving the craniomaxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(3):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.044.