Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-05-23
Abstract Views: 96
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 100
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v176i3.2322
Issue
Vol. 176 No. 3 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thùy, T. T. V. ., Trí, N. M. ., Toán, Đào V. ., Nguyệt, T. T. ., Phúc, N. T. ., Quế, T. N. ., Khanh, N. B. ., Thanh, N. H. ., Hoàng, N. V. ., Long, N. V. ., & Huyền, T. T. T. . (2024). 5. Characteristics of collected umbilical cord blood samples at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from 2021 - 2023. Journal of Medical Research, 176(3), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v176i3.2322

5. Characteristics of collected umbilical cord blood samples at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from 2021 - 2023

Tuong Thi Van Thuy, Nguyen Manh Tri, Dao Van Toan, Tran Thi Nguyet, Nguyen Trong Phuc, Tran Ngoc Que, Nguyen Ba Khanh, Nguyen Ha Thanh, Nguyen Van Hoang, Nguyen Van Long, Truong Thi Thu Huyen

Main Article Content

Abstract

Cord blood (CB) has become an extremely valuable source of stem cells for regenerative medicine. The collection of CB always bears a risk of low collected volume and microbiological contamination, which affects storage and future use. Therefore, this study was conducted to describe the characteristics of CBs and explore the relationship of maternal, neonatal and obstetric factors to CB collection results. Cross-sectional descriptive study on 434 CB samples collected at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from October 2021 to June 2023. All collected CB were with the private purpose. The ratio of boys/girls with CB collected was 1.6. The average volume of CB was 85.7 ± 27.2ml. Microbiological testing recorded that 1.8% of CB samples were positive (fungi, bacteria). The positive CB had a lower average volume than the negative group (69.3ml vs 86.2ml, p < 0.01). Factors associated with low collected CB volume include maternal systemic disease, lower birth weight (< 3000gram), younger gestational age (< 37 weeks), and female. Lower CB volume significantly increases the risk of CB contamination. Other factors such as maternal obstetric diseases, collector, and type of birth have not been found to be significant in predicting low collected CB volume or infection.

Article Details

Keywords

cord blood, cord blood bank, sample volume, contaminated sample

References

1. Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HA, Auerbach AD, et al. Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi’s anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(17):1174-1178. doi:10.1056/NEJM198910263211707
2. Milano F, Gooley T, Wood B, et al. Cord-Blood Transplantation in Patients with Minimal Residual Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):944-953. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1602074
3. Ruggeri A, Galimard JE, Labopin M, et al. Comparison of Outcomes after Unrelated Double-Unit Cord Blood and Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Adults with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Study on Behalf of Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(10):710.e1-710.e10. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.006
4. Xue E, Milano F. Are we underutilizing bone marrow and cord blood? Review of their role and potential in the era of cellular therapies. F1000Research. 2020;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-26. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20605.1
5. World Marrow Donor Association. Database. WMDA Finance & Activities Report 2022. https://share.wmda.info/display/WMDAREG/Database. Published 2023. Accessed March 13, 2024.
6. Linder KA, McDonald PJ, Kauffman CA, et al. Infectious Complications After Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation for Hematological Malignancy. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(2):ofz037. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz037
7. Laue J, Ambühl J, Surbek D. Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(1):93. doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07003-x
8. Dessels C, Alessandrini M, Pepper MS. Factors Influencing the Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Industry: An Evolving Treatment Landscape. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7(9):643-650. doi:10.1002/sctm.17-0244
9. AABB. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, 33rd edition. Published 2022. https://www.aabb.org/aabb-store/product/standards-for-blood-banks-and-transfusion-services-33rd-edition---print-15998348. Accessed January 5, 2024.
10. Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT). Seventh Edition NetCord-FACT International Standards for Cord Blood Collection, Banking, and Release for Administration. http://www.factweb.org/forms/store/ProductFormPublic/seventh-edition-netcord-fact-international-standards-for-cord-blood-collection-banking-and-release-for-administration-print-version. Accessed January 13, 2024.
11. Wu S, Xie G, Wu J, et al. Influence of maternal, infant, and collection characteristics on high-quality cord blood units in Guangzhou Cord Blood Bank. Transfusion (Paris). 2015;55(9):2158-2167. doi:10.1111/trf.13126
12. Jamali M, Atarodi K, Nakhlestani M, et al. Cord blood banking activity in Iran National Cord Blood Bank: a two years experience. Transfus Apher Sci Off J World Apher Assoc Off J Eur Soc Haemapheresis. 2014;50(1):129-135. doi:10.1016/j.transci.2013.09.012
13. Ballen KK, Verter F, Kurtzberg J. Umbilical cord blood donation: public or private? Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(10):1271-1278. doi:10.1038/bmt.2015.124
14. Nguyễn Thị Duyên, Lê Thị Nghĩa, Nguyễn Thị Thúy Mậu, và cs. Khảo sát một số chỉ số huyết học và chất lượng mẫu máu cuống rốn lưu trữ tại Bệnh viện Nhi Trung ương. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2019;123(7):15-25.
15. Đặng Thị Thu Hằng. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng quy trình thu thập, xử lý, bảo quản tế bào gốc máu dây rốn cộng đồng. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2020. https://sdh.hmu.edu.vn/images/00_TVLAhanghhtm35.pdf.
16. Chang YH, Yang SH, Wang TF, et al. Complete Blood Count Reference Values of Cord Blood in Taiwan and the Influence of Gender and Delivery Route on Them. Pediatr Neonatol. 2011;52(3):155-160. doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.03.007
17. Ballen KK, Wilson M, Wuu J, et al. Bigger is better: maternal and neonatal predictors of hematopoietic potential of umbilical cord blood units. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27(1):7-14. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1702729
18. Page KM, Mendizabal A, Betz-Stablein B, et al. Optimizing donor selection for public cord blood banking: influence of maternal, infant, and collection characteristics on cord blood unit quality. Transfusion (Paris). 2014;54(2):340-352. doi:10.1111/trf.12257
19. Keersmaekers CL, Mason BA, Keersmaekers J, et al. Factors affecting umbilical cord blood stem cell suitability for transplantation in an in utero collection program. Transfusion (Paris). 2014;54(3):545-549. doi:10.1111/trf.12340
20. Reuther S, Floegel K, Ceusters G, et al. Contamination Rate of Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood Is Inversely Correlated with Volume of Sample Collected and Is also Dependent on Delivery Mode. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022;11(6):604-612. doi:10.1093/stcltm/szac020
21. Mousavi SH, Zarrabi M, Abroun S, et al. Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: Collection up to transplantation. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2019;13(2):79-89. doi:10.4103/ajts.AJTS_124_18
22. Pamela C, Annnatte T, Damien S, et al. Factors affecting microbial contamination rate of cord blood collected for transplantation. Transfusion (Paris). 2012;52(8). doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03507.x